2.9 - Coastal Management
The purpose and types of coastal management strategies
Coastal management involves implementing strategies to protect coastlines from erosion, flooding, and other natural processes that threaten human settlements, infrastructure, and ecosystems. These strategies are broadly categorised into hard engineering and soft engineering, each with distinct approaches to mitigating coastal hazards.
Objectives of coastal management
- Erosion prevention - To safeguard cliffs and beaches from being worn away by wave action and other natural forces.
- Flood protection - To reduce the risk of flooding in coastal areas, protecting homes, businesses, and farmland.
- Sediment control - To manage the movement of sediment along the coast, preventing loss in some areas and build-up in others.
- Balancing human and environmental needs - To protect economic interests while maintaining natural coastal processes and ecosystems where possible.
Categories of coastal management
- Hard engineering - Involves constructing physical structures to control or resist natural coastal processes like wave energy and erosion.
- Soft engineering - Focuses on working with natural processes, using less intrusive methods to manage coastal retreat and erosion.
Hard engineering methods for coastal protection
Hard engineering strategies use man-made structures to directly combat coastal erosion and flooding. These methods are often employed in areas of high population density or economic importance where immediate protection is necessary.
Cliff-base management techniques
- Sea walls - Large, curved concrete barriers designed to reflect wave energy back into the sea. Effective in high density areas but costly and vulnerable to foundation erosion, with a lifespan of around 30-40 years.
- Revetments - Sloping structures with a porous design to absorb wave energy. They are easier to make and cheaper than sea walls but have a limited lifespan.
- Gabions - Wire cages filled with rocks placed at the base of cliffs to absorb wave energy. They are cheaper than sea walls but are small-scale solutions.
- Groynes - Structures built perpendicular to the shore to prevent longshore drift. They are relatively low cost and easy to repair but can cause erosion on the downdrift side and interrupt sediment flow.
- Rock armour - Large boulders placed at the cliff base to absorb wave impact. This method is cheap but visually unappealing and may be displaced during severe storms.
- Offshore breakwaters - Structures positioned offshore to reduce wave power. They are cheap to construct but can disrupt local ecology.
- Rock strongpoints - Specific points along the coast reinforced to reduce longshore drift. They are relatively low-cost and repairable but can lead to erosion downdrift and disrupt longshore drift.
Cliff-face strategies
- Cliff drainage - Systems installed to remove water from within cliff rocks. This is cost-effective, but drains can create new weak points, and dry cliffs might still experience rockfalls.
- Cliff regrading - Reducing the slope angle of cliffs to make them more stable, particularly effective for clay cliffs. However, it requires significant land space, making it impractical in heavily populated areas.
- Vegetating the surface - Planting vegetation on cliff faces to increase interception and reduce overland run-off. While relatively low cost, this can sometimes increase soil moisture, raising the risk of landslides.
Soft engineering approaches to coastal management
Soft engineering strategies aim to work with natural processes rather than resist them. These methods are often more sustainable and environmentally friendly, though they may not provide immediate or complete protection.
Techniques in soft engineering
- Offshore reefs - Constructed from waste materials like weighted-down old tyres to reduce speed of incoming waves. This low-tech option is relatively cost effective, but its long-term impacts are unknown.
- Beach nourishment - Involves adding sand to eroded beaches, often pumped from the seabed. While it looks natural, it is expensive and only a short-term solution.
- Managed retreat - Allowing the coastline to erode naturally in specific areas. This is cost-effective and maintains a natural coastline but is often unpopular due to political implications.
- Do nothing - Accepting that nature will win without intervention. This approach is cost-effective but generally unpopular with political implications.
- Red-lining - Withdrawing planning permission for development near vulnerable coastlines and establishing new defensive lines further inland. This is cost-effective but unpopular with political implications.
Strengths and weaknesses of coastal protection strategies
Each coastal management strategy has its advantages and limitations, which must be carefully considered based on local conditions, budget constraints, and community needs. The choice of strategy often involves balancing immediate protection with long-term sustainability.
Key considerations in coastal management
- Localized impacts - Some strategies, like groynes, protect one area but may increase erosion downdrift by trapping sediment, demonstrating that solutions are not universally beneficial along a coastline.
- Storm limitations - Even robust structures like sea walls have limits, as intense storms may have waves that exceed their protective height.
- Community and political factors - Strategies such as managed retreat or do nothing, while cost-effective, often face opposition from local residents and policymakers due to the perceived inaction.