1.4 - Bayonet Charge
Context
Historical and social context
- The poem was written in 1957, decades after the First World War ended.
- This distance allowed Ted Hughes to offer a modern, critical perspective on the conflict.
- It challenges the heroic and patriotic narratives that were common during and immediately after the war.
- Hughes aims to expose the brutal reality of combat, free from the pressure of wartime propaganda.
Poet's background
- Ted Hughes's father was a veteran of the First World War.
- His father's experiences of trench warfare, particularly at Gallipoli, deeply influenced Hughes's understanding of war's psychological trauma.
- The poem reflects a second-hand, yet profound, insight into the terror and dehumanisation soldiers faced.
- This personal connection to the war adds a layer of authenticity and emotional weight to the poem.
Literary context
- Hughes wrote during a post-war era that was questioning traditional notions of heroism and patriotism.
- The poem rejects the romanticised view of war often found in earlier poetry.
- Instead, Hughes uses chaotic structure and brutal, animalistic imagery to reflect a more modern understanding of its true horror.
- This aligns with a broader literary shift towards realism and psychological exploration.
Overview
Bayonet Charge in a nutshell
- What literally happens in the poem: A soldier is thrown into the middle of a bayonet charge. He runs across a field, momentarily questions his purpose, but then abandons all thought and patriotic ideals, driven only by terror and survival instinct.
- Context and significance: Influenced by his father's WWI experiences, Hughes wrote this poem to strip away the "glory" of war and expose the visceral, dehumanising terror of combat. It argues that abstract ideas like honour are meaningless when faced with imminent death.
- Key techniques and approach: Hughes uses a chaotic, uneven structure with enjambment [line runs to next] and caesura [pause mid-line], alongside brutal, physical imagery, to immerse the reader in the soldier's panic and confusion.
Lines 1-8
"Suddenly he awoke and was running – raw
In raw-seamed hot khaki, his sweat heavy,
Stumbling across a field of clods towards a green hedge
That dazzled with rifle fire, hearing
Bullets smacking the belly out of the air –
He lugged a rifle numb as a smashed arm;
The patriotic tear that had brimmed in his eye
Sweating like molten iron from the centre of his chest, –"
Translation
- A soldier abruptly finds himself running in battle, feeling inexperienced and vulnerable ("raw").
- He is weighed down by his hot, uncomfortable uniform and heavy sweat.
- As he stumbles towards a hedge lit up by enemy fire, he can hear bullets flying past him.
- The rifle he carries feels useless and dead, and the patriotism he once felt has become a source of pain, like burning metal in his chest.
Hughes's intention
- The poem begins in medias res [in the middle of the action] with "Suddenly he awoke", plunging the reader directly into the soldier's disorientation and shock.
- The repetition of "raw" emphasises his vulnerability and lack of preparation for this brutal reality.
- The violent verb "smacking" and the simile [comparison using 'like' or 'as'] "numb as a smashed arm" create a semantic field [group of words linked by theme] of physical pain, grounding the experience in the body.
- The metaphor [describing something as something else] of the tear "sweating like molten iron" shows how patriotic ideals have transformed from a noble emotion into an unbearable physical burden.
Lines 9-15
"In bewilderment then he almost stopped –
In what cold clockwork of the stars and the nations
Was he the hand pointing that second? He was running
Like a man who has jumped up in the dark and runs
Listening between his footfalls for the reason
Of his still running, and his foot hung like
Statuary in mid-stride. Then the shot-slashed furrows"
Translation
- Confused, the soldier nearly stops running.
- He questions his role in the war, feeling like a tiny, insignificant part of a huge, indifferent machine ("cold clockwork").
- He compares himself to someone waking from a nightmare, running without knowing why.
- For a moment, time seems to freeze as his foot hangs in the air like a statue, before the battlefield's reality returns.
Hughes's intention
- This stanza creates a pause in the action, marked by caesurae, reflecting the soldier's moment of internal conflict and questioning.
- The metaphor of "cold clockwork" suggests that war is a mechanical, uncaring process, and he is just a disposable component, dehumanising his role.
- The simile "like a man who has jumped up in the dark" reinforces the idea of a nightmarish, irrational experience.
- The image of his foot "like / Statuary in mid-stride" captures his psychological paralysis, caught between the instinct to run and the sudden, overwhelming realisation of his situation's absurdity.
Lines 16-23
"Threw up a yellow hare that rolled like a flame
And crawled in a threshing circle, its mouth wide
Open silent, its eyes standing out.
He plunged past with his bayonet toward the green hedge,
King, honour, human dignity, etcetera
Dropped like luxuries in a yelling alarm
To get out of that blue crackling air
His terror's touchy dynamite."
Translation
- The gunfire disturbs a yellow hare, which runs in panicked circles in its death throes.
- The soldier runs past it, his focus returning to the charge.
- All the noble reasons he thought he was fighting for - King, honour, dignity - are dismissed as useless luxuries.
- His only motivation now is to escape the danger, driven by a terror so powerful it feels like an explosive.
Hughes's intention
- The "yellow hare" serves as a powerful symbol. Its agonised, unnatural death ("threshing circle") mirrors the soldier's own fate, showing how war destroys innocent nature as well as humanity.
- The dismissive term "etcetera" and the simile "Dropped like luxuries" powerfully convey how patriotic ideals are meaningless in a life-or-death struggle.
- The poem ends abruptly on the powerful metaphor "His terror's touchy dynamite."
- This suggests the soldier has been completely dehumanised, transformed from a thinking person into a volatile, instinct-driven weapon.
Writer's methods
Analysing form, structure, and language together allows for a cohesive understanding of a poem. In Bayonet Charge, Hughes combines these elements to immerse the reader in the chaotic and terrifying reality of war, ensuring his anti-war message is felt as well as understood.
Form
The poem is written in free verse, with no regular rhyme scheme or metre. This lack of pattern helps to convey the chaos and unpredictability of the battlefield.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Chaos of war | The poem is written in free verse with no consistent rhyme or rhythm. | Hughes rejects traditional, ordered poetic forms to mirror the disorganised and terrifying reality of battle. This makes the reader feel the soldier's lack of control. |
| Universal experience | The soldier is an anonymous "he" throughout the poem. | By not giving the soldier a name or identity, Hughes turns him into an archetypal figure. This suggests his experience of terror and dehumanisation is universal for all soldiers. |
Structure
The poem's three-stanza structure maps the soldier's psychological journey from dazed runner to questioning individual to pure, instinctual weapon.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Disorientation and shock | The poem starts in medias res (in the middle of the action) with the line "Suddenly he awoke and was running". | Hughes throws the reader directly into the action without context. This creates a sense of confusion and panic, mirroring the soldier's own disorienting experience. |
| Panic and breathlessness | Enjambment and caesurae are used throughout, creating an uneven, stumbling rhythm. | The irregular pace forces the reader to feel breathless and off-balance. This reflects the soldier's physical journey stumbling across the field and his internal psychological turmoil. |
| Psychological breakdown | The second stanza slows the pace, focusing on the soldier's internal thoughts and his feeling of being a cog in a "cold clockwork" machine. | This structural pause highlights the moment of crisis where the soldier's humanity asserts itself. It contrasts sharply with the frantic pace of the first and third stanzas, emphasising his internal conflict before he succumbs to pure instinct. |
Language
Hughes uses visceral, physical language to ground the poem in painful reality, stripping away any glamour from the conflict.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Physical reality of war | The semantic field of physical suffering, using words like "raw", "sweat heavy", and the violent verb "smacking". | Hughes wants to ensure the reader understands war as a painful, physical experience, not an abstract concept. This directly counters romanticised depictions of clean, heroic soldiers. |
| Dehumanisation | The simile "He lugged a rifle numb as a smashed arm" and the final metaphor "His terror's touchy dynamite". | These images show the soldier's transformation. First, his weapon feels alien and broken, but by the end, he himself has become the weapon - a dangerous, explosive, and non-human force. |
| Destruction of patriotism | The listing of abstract nouns "King, honour, human dignity, etcetera" which are then "Dropped like luxuries". | The dismissive "etcetera" shows contempt for these ideals. Calling them "luxuries" powerfully suggests they are useless indulgences that have no place in the brutal reality of survival. |
| Destruction of nature | The imagery of the "yellow hare that rolled like a flame" in a "threshing circle". | The hare's violent, unnatural death symbolises how war corrupts and destroys everything, not just humans. It acts as an allegory [symbolic extended metaphor] for the soldier's own fate. |
What to compare it to
Effective comparison involves moving beyond simple similarities and differences. Focus on how poets use different methods to explore similar themes or achieve different purposes, linking your points back to the poems' contexts.
Suggested comparisons
- Bayonet Charge and Exposure - Both poems reveal the harsh realities of WWI, but one focuses on the terror of action and the other on the suffering of inaction.
- Bayonet Charge and The Charge of the Light Brigade - These poems offer directly opposing views on warfare, with Hughes's poem acting as a powerful rebuttal to Tennyson's glorification of patriotic duty.
- Bayonet Charge and Remains - Both explore the psychological impact and dehumanising effects of conflict, but from different perspectives: One during the event, the other dealing with its aftermath.
Bayonet Charge and Exposure
Comparison in a nutshell
Both Hughes and Owen expose the brutal reality of WWI, challenging patriotic propaganda. However, Hughes focuses on the frantic terror of a single moment of action, while Owen explores the slow, grinding psychological despair of waiting for something to happen.
Similarities
Point
Both poets use powerful natural and physical imagery to convey the suffering of soldiers and present war as an overwhelming, destructive force.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | Exposure |
|---|---|
| Hughes describes the soldier's sweat as "heavy" and his patriotism as a painful burden like "molten iron". This intense physical imagery grounds the soldier's terror in his body. | Similarly, Owen personifies nature as the main enemy, with "merciless iced east winds that knive us". This shows the soldiers' suffering is relentless and caused by their environment, not just enemy soldiers. |
| Hughes uses the image of the dying "yellow hare" to show that war's violence destroys innocent nature as well as humanity. | Likewise, Owen uses bleak natural imagery like "shivering ranks of grey" to describe the dawn, blurring the line between the weather and an enemy army. Both poems show nature being corrupted by conflict. |
Differences
Point
The poets use contrasting structural techniques to reflect different aspects of warfare: Hughes captures the chaos of action, whereas Owen captures the monotony of waiting.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | Exposure |
|---|---|
| Hughes uses an irregular structure with frequent enjambment and caesurae. This creates a stumbling, unpredictable rhythm that mirrors the soldier's panicked and chaotic charge across the battlefield. | In contrast, Owen uses a rigid, repetitive eight-line stanza structure. The consistent use of the anticlimactic final line, "But nothing happens", creates a monotonous and futile tone, reflecting the endless, grinding despair of trench warfare. |
| The poem begins in medias res, plunging the reader into a moment of high-intensity action. This focuses on the immediate, visceral terror of combat. | Conversely, Owen's poem has a static, unchanging feel. The cyclical structure emphasises that the soldiers are trapped in a state of perpetual waiting, where the real conflict is a psychological battle against exposure and despair. |
Endings comparison
Point
Both poems end without hope or resolution, but Hughes's ending is explosive and violent, while Owen's is bleak and resigned.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | Exposure |
|---|---|
| The poem concludes with the soldier becoming "His terror's touchy dynamite". This powerful metaphor suggests he has been dehumanised into a volatile weapon, leaving the reader with a sense of explosive, unresolved violence. | Owen's poem ends with the image of "All their eyes are ice" and the final repetition of "But nothing happens". This ending offers no release, only the certainty of a slow, frozen death and the psychological emptiness of their sacrifice. |
Bayonet Charge and The Charge of the Light Brigade
Comparison in a nutshell
These poems present directly opposing views of a military charge. Tennyson's poem is a piece of patriotic propaganda that glorifies obedience and sacrifice, while Hughes's poem is an anti-war piece that exposes the terror and dehumanisation of such an event.
Similarities
Point
Both poems focus on the experience of soldiers charging into a battlefield where they face almost certain death from overwhelming enemy fire.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | The Charge of the Light Brigade |
|---|---|
| The soldier runs towards a "green hedge / That dazzled with rifle fire", highlighting the immediate and lethal danger he faces alone. The focus is on his individual terror. | Similarly, Tennyson describes how the soldiers rode "Into the valley of Death", surrounded by "Cannon to right of them, / Cannon to left of them". This emphasises the scale of the danger faced by the collective group. |
Differences
Point
Tennyson uses a regular, rhythmic structure to create a heroic and noble tone, whereas Hughes uses a chaotic, irregular structure to convey terror and confusion.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | The Charge of the Light Brigade |
|---|---|
| Hughes's use of enjambment and caesura creates a stumbling, breathless pace. This forces the reader to experience the physical and mental panic of the individual soldier. | In contrast, Tennyson uses a strong dactylic dimeter ("Half a league, half a league"). This creates a driving, drum-like rhythm that sounds like galloping horses, transforming the charge into a grand, heroic, and almost mythical event. |
| Hughes portrays patriotism as a useless burden, describing how "King, honour, human dignity, etcetera / Dropped like luxuries". This critiques the very ideals that send men to war. | Conversely, Tennyson celebrates unquestioning obedience as the ultimate duty. The line "Theirs not to reason why, / Theirs but to do and die" presents the soldiers' sacrifice as noble and heroic, discouraging any questioning of the orders that led to their deaths. |
Endings comparison
Point
Tennyson's poem ends with a command to the reader to honour the soldiers' glory, while Hughes's poem ends with the soldier's complete loss of humanity.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | The Charge of the Light Brigade |
|---|---|
| The poem ends abruptly on the image of the soldier as "dynamite". This offers no glory or honour, only the terrifying idea that war's sole purpose is to turn a man into a destructive, instinctual machine. | Tennyson's final stanza is a direct address to the reader, using imperatives [commands] like "Honour the charge they made!". It immortalises the soldiers as the "Noble six hundred!", ensuring their legacy is one of glory, not of a tragic military blunder. |
Bayonet Charge and Remains
Comparison in a nutshell
Both poems explore the dehumanising and psychologically damaging effects of conflict. However, Bayonet Charge focuses on the transformation of a soldier into an unthinking weapon in the heat of battle, while Remains explores the lasting psychological trauma (PTSD) that haunts a soldier long after the event is over.
Similarities
Point
Both poems show how soldiers become dehumanised by their experience of conflict, losing their sense of identity and moral judgment.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | Remains |
|---|---|
| The soldier's patriotism and humanity are "Dropped like luxuries", and he is reduced to "His terror's touchy dynamite". He becomes an object of pure instinct and violence, losing his individuality. | Similarly, the soldier in Remains acts as part of an anonymous group ("myself and somebody else and somebody else"). The casual, brutal action of tossing a man's "guts back into his body" shows a desensitisation to violence. |
| The soldier questions his role in the "cold clockwork of the stars and the nations", feeling like a pawn in a larger game he doesn't control. | Likewise, the soldier in Remains acts on a vague premise ("probably armed, possibly not"), showing a lack of personal agency and moral certainty in the moment of violence. Both poems portray soldiers as instruments of a larger force. |
Differences
Point
Hughes uses a third-person narrative to create a universal, archetypal experience of combat, while Armitage uses a first-person, colloquial voice to create a personal and intimate account of trauma.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | Remains |
|---|---|
| The soldier is only ever referred to as "he". This anonymity makes his experience symbolic of all soldiers in all wars, focusing on the universal nature of fear in battle. | In contrast, the first-person perspective ("I see every round as it rips through his life") and colloquial language ("legs it") make the narrative feel like a personal confession. This focuses on the individual's enduring guilt and memory. |
| The trauma in Bayonet Charge is immediate and physical, taking place in the "blue crackling air" of the battlefield. The conflict is external. | Conversely, the trauma in Remains is internal and occurs after the event. The real conflict is in the soldier's mind, as the memory "bursts again through the doors of the bank" when he is "home on leave". |
Endings comparison
Point
The ending of Bayonet Charge focuses on the soldier's transformation into a physical threat, while the ending of Remains highlights the inescapable and personal nature of guilt.
Evidence and explanation
| Bayonet Charge | Remains |
|---|---|
| The poem ends on an image of explosive potential: "His terror's touchy dynamite." The focus is on what the soldier has become in that moment - a dangerous, dehumanised weapon. The ending is unresolved and forward-looking in its violence. | The poem ends with the soldier's internal realisation of his personal responsibility: "his bloody life in my bloody hands." The final line internalises the conflict, suggesting a permanent state of guilt from which there is no escape. The ending is a psychological prison. |