1.5 - Exposure
Context
Historical and social context
- Written in the winter of 1917, Exposure describes the brutal reality of trench warfare in the First World War.
- Owen reveals the shocking truth that more soldiers died from the extreme weather conditions (exposure) than from enemy bullets.
- The poem directly challenges the patriotic propaganda back in Britain, which often depicted war as heroic and glorious.
- It exposes the gap between the myth of war and its reality: long periods of boredom, suffering, and pointless death.
The poet's background
- Wilfred Owen was a soldier who fought and died in the First World War.
- He was killed in action just one week before the war ended in November 1918, which gives his poetry a powerful sense of truth.
- His first-hand experience of the horrors of the trenches allowed him to write with authenticity about the suffering of ordinary soldiers.
- Owen used his poetry as a form of protest to show the public the true, unglamorous nature of conflict.
Anti-war message
- Owen's main purpose was to convey the "pity of War" and challenge the idea that it is noble to die for one's country.
- By focusing on the silent, invisible killer of the weather, he suggests the real enemy isn't another soldier but war itself.
- He uses the collective pronoun "we" throughout the poem to speak for all soldiers, sharing their collective trauma and despair.
- The poem highlights the psychological torment of war, showing how it destroys the soldiers' minds and spirits as well as their bodies.
Overview
Exposure in a nutshell
- What literally happens in the poem: Soldiers are in a trench during the First World War, awake at night in the freezing cold. They are not fighting the enemy but are under attack from the extreme weather, which causes them to suffer and die.
- Context and significance: Written by soldier-poet Wilfred Owen, the poem is a powerful protest against war. It exposes the bleak reality that soldiers were more likely to die from the weather than from combat, challenging the heroic myths about warfare.
- Key techniques and approach: Owen uses a repetitive structure, half-rhymes [words that almost rhyme but not quite], and personification [giving human qualities to objects] to convey the monotony, unease, and brutal power of nature in the trenches.
Lines 1-5
"Our brains ache, in the merciless iced east winds that knive us . . .
Wearied we keep awake because the night is silent . . .
Low drooping flares confuse our memory of the salient . . .
Worried by silence, sentries whisper, curious, nervous,
But nothing happens."
Translation
- The soldiers are physically and mentally exhausted in the freezing wind.
- They are waiting for something to happen in the silence of the night, but the quiet makes them anxious.
- The only light comes from flares, which makes it hard for them to remember their position in the trench system.
- The stanza ends with an anti-climax, as their fearful waiting leads to nothing.
Owen's intention
- Owen begins with the collective pronoun "Our" to show this is a shared, universal experience for all soldiers.
- The wind is personified as a violent attacker that can "knive" them, suggesting nature is a more immediate and cruel enemy than the German soldiers. This is part of a semantic field [group of words with a similar theme] of weather as a weapon.
- The ellipses (...) create a sense of time dragging on and the soldiers' energy fading away.
- The final, short line "But nothing happens" emphasises the futility and boredom of their situation, subverting the expectation of action in a war poem.
Lines 11-15
"Dawn massing in the east her melancholy army
Attacks once more in ranks on shivering ranks of grey,
But nothing happens."
Translation
- The sun rises, but instead of bringing hope and warmth, it is described as another sad, grey army attacking the soldiers.
- The soldiers continue to shiver in the cold, and the arrival of a new day brings no relief from their suffering.
- Again, the stanza ends with the repetitive statement that their situation remains unchanged and hopeless.
Owen's intention
- Owen uses military language like "massing" and "army" to describe the dawn. This personification presents nature as an organised military force, continuing the idea that the weather is the true enemy.
- He subverts the traditional symbol of dawn, which usually represents new beginnings and hope. Here, the "melancholy army" of dawn only promises more misery, showing how war corrupts everything.
- The repetition of "ranks" of grey clouds attacking "shivering ranks" of soldiers creates a powerful parallel, showing the men are as exposed and vulnerable as the landscape.
Lines 21-25
"Pale flakes with fingering stealth come feeling for our faces-
We cringe in holes, back on forgotten dreams, and stare, snow-dazed,
Deep into grassier ditches. So we drowse, sun-dozed,
Littered with blossoms trickling where the blackbird fusses.
-Is it that we are dying?"
Translation
- The snow is described as stealthily touching the soldiers' faces.
- The men retreat into their dugouts ("holes") and begin to hallucinate about warm, natural images of home, like "grassier ditches" and "blossoms".
- This dream-like state makes them question their reality, leading to the chilling realisation that they might be dying from hypothermia.
Owen's intention
- The personification of the snow having "fingering stealth" makes it seem like a sly, creeping predator hunting the men.
- The soldiers "cringe in holes", which uses animalistic imagery to suggest they have been dehumanised and reduced to frightened creatures.
- The beautiful, gentle images of home are a stark juxtaposition [contrasting elements placed together] to the harsh reality of the trench. This highlights the psychological pain of their situation.
- The direct question "Is it that we are dying?" shows their confusion and detachment from reality as their bodies and minds begin to shut down.
Lines 26-30
"Slowly our ghosts drag home: glimpsing the sunk fires, glozed
With crusted dark-red jewels; crickets jingle there;
For hours the innocent mice rejoice: the house is theirs;
Shutters and doors, all closed: on us the doors are closed,-
We turn back to our dying."
Translation
- The soldiers imagine their spirits travelling home, only to find the fires are dying and the doors are shut against them.
- They feel completely cut off and forgotten by the world they left behind.
- This vision offers no comfort, so they resign themselves to their fate in the trench.
Owen's intention
- The metaphor of "ghosts" suggests the soldiers already feel dead and disconnected from life.
- The image of home is not comforting. The repetition of "closed" emphasises their feeling of total alienation and abandonment. They are shut out from the life they are supposedly fighting to protect.
- The caesura [pause mid-line] after "closed,-" creates a moment of painful finality.
- The blunt statement "We turn back to our dying" shows their complete loss of hope and acceptance of their fate.
Lines 36-40
"Tonight, this frost will fasten on this mud and us,
Shrivelling many hands, and puckering foreheads crisp.
The burying-party, picks and shovels in shaking grasp,
Pause over half-known faces. All their eyes are ice,
But nothing happens."
Translation
- The speaker predicts that the frost will freeze the mud and the soldiers together, killing them.
- He describes the physical effects of freezing to death.
- The living soldiers in the burial party are barely able to hold their tools. They look at the frozen, dead faces of their comrades.
- The poem ends with the same phrase as the first stanza, creating a cyclical structure of endless, pointless suffering.
Owen's intention
- The final repetition of "But nothing happens" is deeply ironic. While men are dying, nothing changes in the grand scheme of the war. Their deaths are insignificant.
- The metaphor "All their eyes are ice" suggests the soldiers are both literally frozen and emotionally numb. War has stripped them of their humanity.
- The cyclical structure reinforces the idea that there is no escape or progress. The suffering is an endless loop.
- Owen's final message is that the soldiers' deaths are futile. They are not dying in a blaze of glory, but freezing to death for nothing.
Writer's methods
Analysing form, structure, and language together allows for a deeper understanding of Owen's themes and intentions. These elements work in combination to convey the bleak, unchanging reality of the soldiers' suffering in the trenches.
Form
The poem is written in eight five-line stanzas (quintains). The consistent form reflects the monotonous and repetitive nature of life in the trenches, where each day is the same cycle of waiting and suffering.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Monotony and futility | Each stanza follows a regular ABBAC rhyme scheme. This pattern creates a sense of predictability, mirroring the repetitive, grinding routine of the soldiers' lives. | Owen wants to convey the relentless boredom and lack of purpose the soldiers feel. The unchanging form suggests their situation is inescapable. |
| Unease and discomfort | Owen frequently uses half-rhymes (e.g., "knive us" / "nervous", "silent" / "salient"). These near-rhymes deny the reader the satisfaction of a perfect rhyme. | The unsettling sound reflects the soldiers' constant state of anxiety and discomfort. Nothing is ever resolved or comfortable, just like their experience of war. |
Structure
The structure of the poem is crucial in conveying the central message that war is not about action, but about endless, static suffering. The poem's progression is emotional and psychological, not event-driven.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Futility and anti-climax | Each stanza ends with a short, indented final line (e.g., "But nothing happens."). This creates a physical gap on the page and a sense of incompletion. | This structure constantly reinforces the theme of futility. Each stanza builds up tension and describes suffering, only to end in an anti-climactic statement of inaction. |
| Hopelessness and entrapment | The poem has a cyclical structure. It begins with the soldiers waiting in the cold ("Our brains ache") and ends with the same sense of stasis ("But nothing happens."). | Owen shows that there is no escape, progress, or resolution for the soldiers. They are trapped in an endless loop of suffering that only ends in a meaningless death. |
Language
Owen uses powerful imagery and personification to portray nature as the true enemy and to highlight the soldiers' physical and psychological pain.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Power of nature | Owen uses a semantic field of weather as a weapon. The wind can "knive" them, and dawn "attacks" with a "melancholy army". | By personifying nature as a violent, deliberate enemy, Owen shows that the greatest threat is not the opposing army but the merciless environment. This subverts the traditional idea of war. |
| Suffering and dehumanisation | The soldiers are described as cringing "in holes". Their frozen eyes are described as "ice". | This animalistic imagery suggests that the brutal conditions of war have stripped the men of their humanity, reducing them to a state of primal fear and numbness. |
| Loss of hope | Traditional symbols of hope are subverted. Dawn, usually a sign of a new start, is a "melancholy army". Home, a place of comfort, has its "doors are closed". | Owen demonstrates how war corrupts everything, even the most fundamental sources of hope and comfort, leaving the soldiers in a state of complete despair. |
What to compare it to
When comparing poems, focus on how the poets use different methods to explore similar ideas about power and conflict. The connections you make should be driven by the poets' purpose and the messages they want to convey.
Suggested comparisons
- Exposure and Bayonet Charge - Both poems reveal the brutal reality of war, but one focuses on the terror of inaction while the other explores the panic of sudden action.
- Exposure and Remains - Both poems explore the psychological trauma of conflict, but they focus on different aspects: Owen on the shared suffering during war, and Armitage on the individual trauma after war.
Exposure and Bayonet Charge
Comparison in a nutshell
Both Owen and Hughes strip war of its patriotic glory to expose its brutal reality. However, Owen focuses on the slow, grinding horror of passive suffering, whereas Hughes captures the chaotic, terrifying panic of a single moment of action.
Similarities
Point
Both poets use vivid imagery to show how soldiers are dehumanised by their experience of conflict, losing their sense of identity and purpose.
Evidence and explanation
| Exposure | Bayonet Charge |
|---|---|
| Owen describes the soldiers as cringing "in holes", using animalistic imagery to show how they have been reduced to a primal state of fear by the relentless cold. | Similarly, Hughes' soldier is "running" like a "man who has jumped up in the dark", suggesting an instinctual, thoughtless panic rather than a conscious act of bravery. |
| The soldiers' eyes are described as "ice", a metaphor suggesting they have become emotionally numb and deadened by their suffering. Their humanity has been frozen out of them. | Likewise, the soldier's rifle is "numb as a smashed arm", a simile that shows his weapon has become a useless burden, and he is disconnected from his role as a soldier. |
Point
Both poems challenge traditional, patriotic ideas about war by showing that abstract concepts like honour and glory are meaningless in the face of brutal reality.
Evidence and explanation
| Exposure | Bayonet Charge |
|---|---|
| Owen shows the soldiers' loss of faith: "For love of God seems dying." This suggests that their suffering has made religious and patriotic beliefs seem hollow and irrelevant. | In the same way, Hughes lists "King, honour, human dignity, etcetera" and shows them being "dropped like luxuries". This demonstrates that in a moment of life-or-death terror, these ideals are worthless. |
Differences
Point
While both poems depict the horror of war, they contrast in their presentation of time and movement, with Owen focusing on static misery and Hughes on frantic motion.
Evidence and explanation
| Exposure | Bayonet Charge |
|---|---|
| Owen uses a slow, repetitive rhythm and a cyclical structure, with the constant refrain "But nothing happens." This creates a sense of endless, grinding monotony and hopeless waiting. | In contrast, Hughes uses enjambment [line runs to next] and an irregular rhythm to create a breathless, chaotic pace. The poem plunges the reader into a single, frantic moment of action, reflecting the soldier's panic. |
Endings comparison
Point
Both poems end on a bleak note, but Exposure concludes with a sense of collective futility, while Bayonet Charge ends with a moment of individual, desperate action.
Evidence and explanation
| Exposure | Bayonet Charge |
|---|---|
| Owen's poem ends with the burial party and the final, ironic line "But nothing happens." This reinforces the cyclical, pointless nature of their suffering and highlights that their deaths change nothing. | Conversely, Bayonet Charge ends with the soldier plunging "toward the green hedge," his terror becoming "touchy dynamite." The ending is unresolved but focuses on a final, violent charge, leaving the reader in a moment of high tension. |
Exposure and Remains
Comparison in a nutshell
Both poems powerfully explore the psychological damage caused by conflict. Owen focuses on the shared, collective trauma experienced by soldiers during the war, whereas Armitage explores the lasting, personal trauma that haunts an individual soldier long after he has returned home.
Similarities
Point
Both poets show that the psychological scars of war are inescapable, demonstrating how memories and trauma continue to affect the soldiers' minds.
Evidence and explanation
| Exposure | Remains |
|---|---|
| Owen's soldiers "drowse, sun-dozed" and hallucinate about home, but these are "forgotten dreams" that offer no comfort. Their minds are a place of confusion and fear, blurring the line between life and death. | Similarly, the soldier in Remains is haunted by the memory of the looter, which "bursts again through the doors of the bank" when he blinks. The trauma is inescapable, replaying in his mind. |
| The soldiers' sense of alienation is clear when they imagine home's "doors are closed" to them. They feel cut off and abandoned, a key part of their psychological suffering. | Likewise, the soldier in Remains is "dug in behind enemy lines" in his own head, suggesting he is trapped and isolated by his PTSD, unable to escape the conflict even when physically safe at home. |
Differences
Point
Owen presents the soldiers' suffering as a collective experience shared by a generation, whereas Armitage focuses on the isolating nature of an individual's trauma.
Evidence and explanation
| Exposure | Remains |
|---|---|
| Owen consistently uses the first-person plural pronouns "we" and "our" ("Our brains ache," "we keep awake"). This emphasises that the suffering is a shared, universal experience for all soldiers in the trenches. | In contrast, Armitage uses the first-person singular "I" and a conversational, anecdotal tone ("On another occasion," "I swear"). This creates a more intimate and personal account, highlighting the solitary nature of the soldier's guilt and trauma. |
| The source of trauma in Exposure is an invisible, relentless enemy - the weather. This external force attacks all the soldiers equally, creating a sense of shared victimhood. | However, the trauma in Remains stems from a single, violent act of killing committed by the soldier ("his bloody life in my bloody hands"). This focuses on personal responsibility and guilt, making the psychological burden uniquely his. |
Endings comparison
Point
Both poems conclude with a sense of being trapped, but Exposure ends with the finality of death in a continuous conflict, while Remains ends with the torment of living with an unending internal conflict.
Evidence and explanation
| Exposure | Remains |
|---|---|
| The poem ends with the finality of "All their eyes are ice" and the confirmation that their deaths mean nothing ("But nothing happens."). The suffering ends only in a futile death within the warzone. | In contrast, the soldier in Remains is still alive, but trapped with his guilt "here and now". The final line, "his bloody life in my bloody hands", shows the trauma is ongoing and inescapable, a life sentence of memory. |