1.3 - Porphyria's Lover
Context
Understanding the context of Porphyria's Lover is essential for analysing its themes of control, gender, and madness. Browning uses the poem to critique the social attitudes of his time, exploring the dark potential of a patriarchal society.
Social and cultural context
- The poem was written in the Victorian era (1836), a period with strict social codes and a patriarchal structure.
- Women were legally considered the property of their fathers or husbands, and female sexuality was often viewed as dangerous or immoral.
- Mental health was poorly understood, with "madness" seen as a moral failing, often hiding behind a respectable exterior.
Literary and biographical context
- Robert Browning was a prominent Victorian poet, renowned for his use of the dramatic monologue [a poem in the voice of a character].
- This form allows the speaker to reveal their own psychology and moral flaws, often unintentionally, without the poet passing direct judgement.
- Browning was interested in the darker aspects of human psychology and morality, often exploring characters at the extreme edges of society.
Overview
Porphyria's Lover in a nutshell
- What literally happens in the poem: A man sits alone in his cottage during a storm. His lover, Porphyria, arrives and kindles a fire, before embracing him and professing her love. Believing this is a perfect moment of her complete devotion, he strangles her with her own hair to preserve it forever. He then sits with her body all night, believing he has fulfilled her wish and that God approves of his action.
- Context and significance: Browning's dramatic monologue explores themes of possessive love, madness, and gender power dynamics. The poem critiques a Victorian society that objectified women, showing how the desire for control can lead to extreme violence.
- Key techniques and approach: The poem's regular form and rhythm contrast sharply with the speaker's horrific actions, creating a disturbing portrait of a delusional narrator who calmly justifies murder.
Translation and Browning's intent
Lines 1-5
"The rain set early in to-night,
The sullen wind was soon awake,
It tore the elm-tops down for spite,
And did its worst to vex the lake:
I listened with heart fit to break."
Translation
- It is a stormy evening. The speaker describes the wind as "sullen" and spiteful, angrily damaging the trees and disturbing the lake. He sits listening to the storm, feeling heartbroken.
Browning's intention
- Browning uses pathetic fallacy [attributing human emotions to nature] to establish a tone of turmoil and unease.
- The violent storm outside the cottage directly mirrors the speaker's internal psychological chaos.
- This creates foreshadowing, hinting at the human violence that will soon disrupt the supposed peace of the cottage.
Lines 6-15
"When glided in Porphyria; straight
She shut the cold out and the storm,
And kneeled and made the cheerless grate
Blaze up, and all the cottage warm;
Which done, she rose, and from her form
Withdrew the dripping cloak and shawl,
And laid her soiled gloves by, untied
Her hat and let the damp hair fall,
And, last, she sat down by my side
And called me. When no voice replied,"
Translation
- Porphyria arrives, shutting the door to block out the storm. She makes a fire in the fireplace, warming the cottage. She then takes off her wet coat, gloves, and hat before sitting next to the silent speaker and calling his name.
Browning's intention
- Porphyria is presented as an active, powerful figure who brings warmth and light, transforming the atmosphere of the room.
- Her series of decisive actions contrasts with the speaker's passivity, establishing her as being in control of the situation.
- The speaker's silence is ominous, suggesting a growing resentment of her agency which he will later seek to destroy.
Lines 16-30
"She put my arm about her waist,
And made her smooth white shoulder bare,
And all her yellow hair displaced,
And, stooping, made my cheek lie there,
And spread, o'er all, her yellow hair,
Murmuring how she loved me — she
Too weak, for all her heart's endeavour,
To set its struggling passion free
From pride, and vainer ties dissever,
And give herself to me for ever.
But passion sometimes would prevail,
Nor could to-night's gay feast restrain
A sudden thought of one so pale
For love of her, and all in vain:
So, she was come through wind and rain."
Translation
- Porphyria physically moves the passive speaker, placing his arm on her waist and resting his head on her bare shoulder.
- She whispers that she loves him and explains that social pressures ("vainer ties") have previously prevented her from committing to him fully.
- Her passion for him has overcome these barriers, and she has left a party to be with him.
Browning's intention
- This section solidifies the power dynamic that the speaker wants to reverse. Porphyria is in control of the intimacy, and the speaker is an object she moves.
- By reporting her speech indirectly, the speaker maintains narrative control, filtering her voice through his own perspective.
- Her confession of love is interpreted by him not as a triumph of her passion, but as a weakness he can exploit.
Lines 31-41
"Be sure I looked up at her eyes
Happy and proud; at last I knew
Porphyria worshipped me; surprise
Made my heart swell, and still it grew
While I debated what to do.
That moment she was mine, mine, fair,
Perfectly pure and good: I found
A thing to do, and all her hair
In one long yellow string I wound
Three times her little throat around,
And strangled her."
Translation
- The speaker looks at Porphyria and decides that she "worshipped" him. In this moment, he believes she is perfect and belongs to him completely.
- Having reached this conclusion, he decides what to do: he takes her long yellow hair, wraps it around her neck three times, and strangles her to death.
Browning's intention
- This is the volta [turning point in a poem] where the speaker's warped logic is fully revealed.
- The repetition of "mine" reveals his possessive view of love; he sees her not as a partner but as property to be owned.
- He kills her to freeze this "perfect" moment of her adoration, demonstrating his desire for absolute control.
Lines 42-60
"No pain felt she;
I am quite sure she felt no pain.
As a shut bud that holds a bee,
I warily oped her lids: again
Laughed the blue eyes without a stain.
And I untightened next the tress
About her neck; her cheek once more
Blushed bright beneath my burning kiss:
I propped her head up as before,
Only, this time my shoulder bore
Her head, which droops upon it still:
The smiling rosy little head,
So glad it has its utmost will,
That all it scorned at once is fled,
And I, its love, am gained instead!
Porphyria's love: she guessed not how
Her darling one wish would be heard.
And thus we sit together now,
And all night long we have not stirred,
And yet God has not said a word!"
Translation
- The speaker assures himself that Porphyria felt no pain. He opens her eyes and imagines they are laughing.
- He kisses her cheek and believes it blushes in response. He props her head on his shoulder, convinced her "utmost will" has been achieved.
- They sit together all night, and the speaker notes with satisfaction that God has not punished him for his actions.
Browning's intention
- The speaker's complete delusion is confirmed as he projects life and happiness onto her corpse to justify his crime.
- The pronoun shift from "her head" to "the smiling rosy little head" and then "it has its utmost will" shows he has successfully objectified her.
- The final line reveals his arrogance; he interprets God's silence as approval, cementing his status as a chillingly unreliable narrator.
Writer's methods
Analysing form, structure and language together is crucial to understanding Browning's purpose. He combines a controlled poetic style with horrific content to expose the dangerous psychology of a speaker who believes love means total possession.
Form
Browning uses a highly regular form to contrast with the speaker's disordered mind, making his madness seem chillingly rational.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Psychological entrapment | The poem is one continuous block of 60 lines with no stanza breaks. | Browning's unbroken form traps the reader inside the speaker's obsessive and claustrophobic mind, mirroring Porphyria's physical entrapment and suffocation. |
| Deceptive madness | The poem uses a regular iambic tetrameter [a steady beat of eight syllables per line] and a consistent ABABB rhyme scheme. | This calm, ordered rhythm creates a disturbing juxtaposition [contrasting elements placed together] with the violent events, suggesting that madness can hide behind a mask of perfect rationality. |
| Silencing and control | The poem is a dramatic monologue, meaning we only hear the speaker's one-sided account of events. | Browning uses this form to highlight how Porphyria is silenced. The speaker controls the entire narrative, and her murder is the ultimate act of silencing her perspective forever. |
Structure
The poem is structured around a dramatic power shift, showing that the murder is a direct response to the speaker's loss of control.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Reversal of power | The poem has a clear two-part structure. In the first half (lines 1-30), Porphyria is active and dominant. In the second half (lines 31-60), the speaker takes absolute, violent control. | Browning structures the poem around this volta (turning point) to show that the murder is an act of patriarchal backlash, a direct result of the speaker's inability to accept a woman having agency. |
| Objectification | After the murder, the speaker's pronouns shift. He refers to Porphyria's head as "it has its utmost will", rather than "she". | This subtle pronoun shift shows the completion of Porphyria's dehumanisation. In the speaker's mind, she is no longer a person but an object he now possesses. |
| Normalisation of violence | The speaker lists his actions in the aftermath of the murder using polysyndeton [repeated use of 'and']: "And I untightened next the tress... And propped her head up". | This list-like structure makes the horrific actions sound calm and methodical, as if they are everyday tasks. It highlights the speaker's complete moral detachment from his crime. |
Language
Browning's language choices reveal the speaker's possessive and delusional mindset.
| Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
|---|---|---|
| Possessive love | The speaker's realisation: "That moment she was mine, mine*, fair, / Perfectly pure and good*". | The emphatic repetition of the possessive pronoun "mine" reveals the core of the speaker's delusion. He believes her love makes her his property, reflecting the Victorian legal view of women in marriage. |
| Madness and delusion | The speaker's statement: "I am quite sure she felt no pain." | This language of absolute certainty is a key sign of his delusion. He cannot know what she felt, so this is a desperate attempt to justify his violence to himself as an act of kindness. |
| Dehumanisation | The description of the murder weapon: "all her hair / In one long yellow string I wound". | The noun "string" reduces Porphyria's hair, a symbol of her femininity, to a mundane, inanimate tool. This shows he must first turn her into an object in his mind before he can physically destroy her. |
What to compare it to
Effective comparison involves moving beyond shared themes to analyse how different poets use methods to present their ideas. When comparing Porphyria's Lover, focus on how poets explore power, possession and desire.
Suggested comparisons
- Porphyria's Lover and The Farmer's Bride - Both poems feature possessive male speakers in a dramatic monologue, frustrated by emotionally distant women.
- Porphyria's Lover and Sonnet 29 "I think of thee," - Both poems explore an obsessive love, but present it in radically different ways: one as destructive and violent, the other as joyful and life-affirming.
Porphyria's Lover and The Farmer's Bride
Comparison in a nutshell
Both Browning and Mew use a dramatic monologue to explore male possession and frustration in a relationship. However, Browning creates a portrait of pure psychopathy, while Mew generates a more complex sense of tragedy and sympathy.
Similarities
Point
Both poems use a dramatic monologue to reveal the perspective of a male speaker who feels a possessive longing for a woman he cannot truly connect with.
Evidence and explanation
| Porphyria's Lover | The Farmer's Bride |
|---|---|
| The speaker's monologue reveals his desire to own Porphyria completely: "That moment she was mine, mine". He controls the narrative entirely, silencing her voice. | Similarly, the farmer's monologue reveals his view of his wife as a possession he "chose". We only hear his side of the story, reflecting his dominance in their relationship. |
| The speaker feels emotionally distant from Porphyria until the one moment he believes she "worshipped" him, which he seeks to preserve forever through murder. | Likewise, the farmer is physically close to his wife but emotionally distant. He describes her as "like a mouse" and laments "what to me?", showing his frustration at their lack of connection. |
Differences
Point
While both speakers are possessive, Browning's speaker is chillingly confident and devoid of empathy, whereas Mew's farmer expresses confusion, sadness and a degree of sympathy for his wife.
Evidence and explanation
| Porphyria's Lover | The Farmer's Bride |
|---|---|
| Browning's speaker is certain in his actions, declaring "I am quite sure she felt no pain" and believing he has fulfilled her "utmost will". He feels no guilt. | In contrast, Mew's farmer is filled with conflicted emotions. He describes her with gentle similes ("Sweet as the first wild violets") but his frustration builds into a desperate cry: "Oh! my God! the down". This creates a sense of tragedy rather than pure horror. |
| The speaker's violence is decisive and final. He finds "a thing to do" and strangles her, a clear resolution that ends the conflict by asserting total control. | Conversely, the farmer's desire remains unresolved. He is trapped in his longing, highlighting the ongoing suffering of both him and his bride. Mew creates a more nuanced psychological portrait of patriarchal frustration. |
Endings comparison
Point
Both poems end with the speakers and their female partners in a state of physical closeness, but the emotional implications are starkly different.
Evidence and explanation
| Porphyria's Lover | The Farmer's Bride |
|---|---|
| The poem ends in the chilling present: "And thus we sit together now". The speaker has achieved a permanent, deathly union and feels justified by God's silence. The ending is a statement of horrifying victory. | In contrast, the ending of The Farmer's Bride is a moment of crisis. The farmer's focus on his wife's "brown" hair and eyes is an explosion of repressed desire, leaving the reader with a sense of dread and unresolved tension. The ending is one of desperate, dangerous longing. |
Porphyria's Lover and Sonnet 29 "I think of thee,"
Comparison in a nutshell
Both poems explore obsessive love and the overwhelming desire for a partner's physical presence. However, Browning presents this obsession as a destructive and possessive force, while Barrett Browning depicts it as a joyful, life-giving one.
Similarities
Point
Both poems depict a speaker whose thoughts are consumed by their beloved, leading them to crave physical union over mere imagination.
Evidence and explanation
| Porphyria's Lover | Sonnet 29 "I think of thee," |
|---|---|
| The speaker is obsessed with possessing Porphyria in a single, perfect moment. Her physical presence triggers his decision to make that presence permanent through death. | Similarly, the speaker of Sonnet 29 is consumed by thoughts of her lover, which "twine and bud / About" him. She desires his physical presence to replace these thoughts, crying "Rather, instantly / Renew thy presence". |
| Both speakers feel a sense of being overwhelmed. Browning's speaker's heart "swell[s]" with the realisation of Porphyria's love, an emotion that directly leads to his violent act. | Likewise, Barrett Browning's speaker feels her thoughts are like "wild vines" that "hide the wood". Her feelings are powerful and almost suffocating, showing a similar intensity of emotion. |
Differences
Point
The outcome of the obsessive love is radically different: in Porphyria's Lover, it leads to violent control and murder, whereas in Sonnet 29, it leads to a joyful and mutual reunion.
Evidence and explanation
| Porphyria's Lover | Sonnet 29 "I think of thee," |
|---|---|
| The male speaker's obsession is possessive. His desire is to own Porphyria, leading him to turn her into an object he can control forever. Love is expressed through domination and violence. | In contrast, the female speaker's obsession is celebratory. She wants her lover to "set [his] trunk all bare" and actively reassert his presence. Love is a partnership that brings "deep joy" and renewal. |
| Browning uses the dramatic monologue to expose a disturbed, unreliable male narrator whose love is a destructive force. The focus is on a dark, internal psychology. | Conversely, Barrett Browning uses the sonnet form, traditionally associated with love poetry, to express a sincere and passionate devotion. The tone is one of open, heartfelt emotion. |
Endings comparison
Point
Both poems conclude with the speaker and their lover physically together, but the nature of this union provides a stark contrast.
Evidence and explanation
| Porphyria's Lover | Sonnet 29 "I think of thee," |
|---|---|
| The poem ends with a horrifying parody of a loving couple: "And thus we sit together now... And all night long we have not stirred". This is a static, one-sided union imposed by the murderer. | In contrast, Sonnet 29 ends with a dynamic and joyful union. The speaker declares "I do not think of thee—I am too near thee". Her obsessive thoughts are replaced by the superior reality of his presence, showing a healthy and mutual resolution. |