The origins and basic concept of the Phillips curve

The Phillips curve illustrates the inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation within an economy. It emerged as a key macroeconomic concept based on historical data analysis.

Development of the Phillips curve

Alban W. Phillips, a New Zealand economist working at the London School of Economics, introduced the Phillips curve in 1958. He examined UK data spanning 96 years, from 1861 to 1957, focusing on changes in money wages and unemployment rates. His findings revealed an inverse correlation: low unemployment corresponded with rapid wage increases, while high unemployment led to slower wage growth or even declines.

Extension to inflation

The relationship extends beyond wages to general price inflation. Wages constitute a major part of production costs, and businesses often apply a mark-up to these costs when setting prices. As a result, the curve depicts an inverse link between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate—lower unemployment tends to drive up inflation as firms compete for workers, pushing wages and prices higher.

The relationship between unemployment and inflation

The Phillips curve highlights how labour market conditions influence wage and price dynamics.

Dynamics in different labour market conditions

• Low unemployment (tight labour market) - Employers compete for limited workers, leading to substantial wage increases to attract and retain staff.
• High unemployment (slack labour market) - Firms can hire without significant wage hikes, resulting in minimal wage growth or potential decreases.

Compatibility with aggregate demand and supply

The Phillips curve fits within the aggregate demand (AD) and aggregate supply (AS) framework. An increase in AD boosts output and prices while reducing unemployment, reflecting the curve's trade-off.

Policy perspective on the trade-off

Policymakers initially saw the Phillips curve as offering a range of options: they could pursue lower unemployment at the cost of higher inflation, or prioritise low inflation by accepting higher unemployment.

The short-run and long-run Phillips curves

Distinctions between short-run and long-run perspectives on the Phillips curve emerged from later economic analysis, revealing limitations in the original model.

Short-run Phillips curve

The short-run Phillips curve slopes downwards, showing a trade-off where lower unemployment coincides with higher inflation. This reflects temporary adjustments in the economy, such as responses to demand changes.

Long-run Phillips curve

In contrast, the long-run Phillips curve is vertical, positioned at the natural rate of unemployment (NRU). This indicates no lasting trade-off: attempts to reduce unemployment below the NRU only result in accelerating inflation without sustained employment gains. The NRU represents the unemployment level consistent with stable inflation, excluding cyclical factors.

The NRU is not fixed; it fluctuates over time and differs between countries due to factors like labour market policies, skills mismatches, and demographic shifts.

The expectations-augmented Phillips curve and its implications

Critiques of the original Phillips curve led to an enhanced version incorporating expectations, explaining why the trade-off breaks down over time.

Key elements of the expectations-augmented Phillips curve

Developed by economists like Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps, this model distinguishes short-run from long-run effects. It attributes short-run trade-offs to workers' adaptive expectations, where they base future inflation predictions on past rates, leading to money illusion—a failure to immediately recognise real wage changes.

Process when reducing unemployment below the natural rate

Expansionary policies aimed at lowering unemployment below the NRU trigger a sequence of events:

• Inflation rises faster than anticipated.
• Real wages fall temporarily, encouraging firms to increase production and hiring.
• Unemployment drops below the NRU in the short run.
• Workers eventually update their expectations and seek higher nominal wages to restore real wages.
• As real wages return to equilibrium, firms reduce hiring, and unemployment reverts to the NRU.

This process demonstrates that short-run gains are illusory, with only higher inflation persisting in the long run.

Historical breakdown of the original relationship

In the 1970s, the stable inverse link between inflation and unemployment weakened, as economies experienced high inflation alongside high unemployment (stagflation), supporting the expectations-augmented view.

Policy considerations and recent challenges to the Phillips curve

Insights from the Phillips curve influence economic policy, but recent trends have questioned its reliability.

Implications for government policy

Governments should avoid using demand-side measures to force unemployment below the NRU, as this leads to accelerating inflation without long-term benefits. Instead, policies should target supply-side improvements to potentially lower the NRU itself.

Recent economic observations

In some economies, unemployment has reached record lows without sparking significant inflation, challenging traditional Phillips curve predictions.

Possible explanations for low inflation despite low unemployment

• Challenges in measuring unemployment types - Distinguishing between structural and cyclical unemployment can be difficult, obscuring the true NRU.
• Labour market re-entry - Discouraged workers returning to the job market may expand the labour supply, suppressing wage pressures.
• Anchored inflation expectations - Persistently low expectations of future inflation can prevent wage and price spirals even as unemployment falls.