2.14 - Organisational Culture
The definition and influences of corporate culture
Corporate culture refers to the shared values, attitudes, norms, and beliefs that shape how an organisation operates. The term was first used by T. Deal and A. Kennedy in 1982 to describe these elements within a business.
Factors that influence corporate culture
Several elements shape an organisation's culture, affecting its overall environment and practices:
- Organisation size - Larger firms may develop more formal cultures, while smaller ones often have flexible, informal ones.
- Senior managers' personalities and behaviour - Leaders' approaches set the tone, influencing how decisions are made and risks are handled.
- Traditions and historical practices - Long-standing customs can embed specific norms over time.
- Management attitudes towards risk - A culture that encourages innovation fosters risk-taking, whereas conservative approaches prioritise caution.
- Societal cultural norms - Broader social values from the surrounding environment can seep into the organisation's culture.
Corporate culture usually develops gradually over years but can shift quickly due to external events, such as a hostile takeover. It underpins key aspects like communication methods, organisational structures, reward mechanisms, and workforce planning. A strong, unified culture fosters a sense of belonging among staff and managers, reducing misunderstandings.
Connection between corporate culture and brand image
Corporate culture is closely linked to a firm's brand image. For example, a forward-thinking technology company with a positive culture can gain a competitive edge by appealing to customers and attracting talented job applicants.
Types of corporate cultures according to Charles Handy
Charles Handy, in his 1999 model, outlined four main types of organisational cultures. He linked these to organisational structures, noting that tall, hierarchical structures often lead to bureaucratic cultures, while flatter structures promote democratic ones.
Characteristics of the four types of corporate cultures
| Type | Key features | Decision-making style | Typical organisations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power culture | Authority is centralised with a few senior leaders; decisions are quick but may harm employee morale. | Centralised and swift | Small family businesses or startups with strong founders |
| Role culture | Based on rules, regulations, and defined roles; formal policies guide operations. | Bureaucratic and structured | Large corporations or government bodies |
| Task culture | Focuses on teams with specialised skills solving specific problems; requires careful team composition for skills and personalities. | Team-based and problem-oriented | Project-based firms like engineering consultancies |
| Person culture | Individuals or their expertise are prioritised over the organisation; common among specialists collaborating loosely. | Individual-driven | Professional services like law firms or research groups |
In a person culture, as Handy noted, employees often see themselves as unique and influential, shaping the organisation around their skills.
Other forms of corporate culture and cultural quotient
Beyond Handy's model, other cultural types exist, reflecting different organisational focuses and adaptability. Cultural quotient (CQ) measures employees' ability and readiness to understand diverse cultures, helping to prevent misunderstandings and bridge cultural differences.
Additional types of corporate cultures
- Entrepreneurial culture - Emphasises innovation, new product ideas, and calculated risks to pursue business opportunities.
- Inert culture - As identified by J. Kotter and J. Heskett in 1992, this involves resistance to change due to negative employee attitudes.
- Adaptive culture - Features united, open teams with high CQ, minimising the risk of cultural conflicts.
Concepts related to cultural alignment
- Cultural norm - The main culture dominating an organisation.
- Culture gap - The mismatch between an organisation's ideal culture and its actual one.
- Team norms - Informal rules developed through interactions among team members and leaders.
Causes and consequences of culture clashes
Culture clash occurs when there are conflicting values and beliefs among individuals in an organisation. This often arises during significant changes and can disrupt operations.
Causes of culture clashes
- Mergers and acquisitions - Introduce new management teams and radical shifts, causing uncertainty and anxiety.
- Leadership inconsistencies - Differing styles among leaders create confusion; weak leadership fails to provide clear direction.
- Organisational growth - Expansion increases miscommunication risks, with sub-cultures forming due to varied terminology or practices.
- Evolutionary changes - Updates like new mission statements may meet resistance from the workforce.
Culture clashes are a primary factor in the failure of many mergers and acquisitions.
Consequences of culture clashes
- Lower staff morale - Employees feel disconnected or undervalued.
- Reduced productivity - Conflicts and confusion hinder efficient work.
- Increased workplace disputes - Tensions rise between individuals or teams.
- Higher staff turnover - Dissatisfied workers leave the organisation.
- Decreased profitability - Overall performance suffers, impacting financial results.
The impact of corporate culture on individuals and organisations
Corporate culture significantly affects both employees and the organisation as a whole, influencing behaviour, motivation, and adaptability.
Effects on individuals
- In power cultures - Employees may feel suppressed as decisions are controlled by seniors, limiting personal input.
- In innovative or person cultures - Individuals can influence the organisation, fulfilling higher-level needs and boosting motivation and creativity.
- Through cultural norms - Senior autocratic styles may pressure others to conform, shaping behaviour.
- In risk-averse cultures - Creativity is stifled, potentially reducing job satisfaction.
Organisational adaptation and influence
Organisations must evolve their cultures in response to changing business landscapes and rising competition. A strong innovative culture enhances motivation and productivity, while inert cultures resist necessary changes. Overall, culture supports or hinders operations, from daily systems to long-term strategies.