11.2 - Accuracy, Precision & Error
Accuracy and precision
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Accurate | Close to the true value |
| Precise | Repeated readings are close to each other (a small spread) |
- A precise result isn't always accurate.
- For example, weighing a 50.0 g mass on a balance that isn't zeroed might give 52.0 g, 52.1 g, and 52.0 g. These readings are precise (they barely differ) but not accurate (they're all about 2 g too high).
Resolution
- The resolution of an instrument is the smallest change it can detect.
- A balance reading to 0.01 g has a higher resolution than one reading to 0.1 g.
- Describe an instrument as having "higher resolution", not as being "more precise" - precision describes how closely a set of readings cluster, not a single reading.
Repeatable and reproducible
- Repeatable - You get similar results when you repeat the investigation yourself, using the same method and equipment.
- Reproducible - Someone else gets similar results, or you get them using a different method or different equipment.
- Reproducible results give more confidence than repeatable ones, because getting a similar result with a different set-up rules out a fault in one person's technique or one piece of equipment.
Estimating uncertainty from repeats
Repeat readings scatter about a mean, and the size of that scatter determines the uncertainty.
Range and uncertainty
- Range - The largest reading minus the smallest reading in a set of repeats.
- Uncertainty - Half the range, because the true value is expected to lie within half the range on either side of the mean:
- Results are written as mean ± uncertainty.
- A larger range means a larger uncertainty and less precise readings.
Worked example - Uncertainty of a titration
A titration repeated three times gives titres of 24.50 cm3, 24.60 cm3, and 24.55 cm3. Find the mean and the uncertainty.
Step 1 - Calculate the mean
Step 2 - Calculate the range
Range = 24.60 - 24.50 = 0.10 cm3
Step 3 - Calculate the uncertainty
Step 4 - Write the result
24.55 ± 0.05 cm3
Random and systematic error
- Random error - An unpredictable difference between readings, such as slight differences in judgement when reading a scale. Taking repeats and calculating a mean reduces its effect.
- Systematic error - A fault that shifts every reading by the same amount in the same direction, such as a balance not set to zero (a zero error). Taking a mean doesn't reduce it.
Effects on accuracy and precision
- Random error scatters readings, reducing precision.
- Systematic error shifts every reading the same way, reducing accuracy.
- A set of results that is precise but not accurate points to a systematic error.
Anomalous results
- An anomalous result (or outlier) lies well outside the scatter of the rest of the readings.
- Exclude anomalies when calculating the mean.
TermDefinition
AccurateDescribes a measurement that is close to the true value.
PreciseDescribes repeated measurements that are close to each other, with very little spread about the mean.
ResolutionThe smallest change an instrument can detect.
RepeatableDescribes results that are similar when the same person repeats the investigation with the same method and equipment.
ReproducibleDescribes results that are similar when someone else repeats the investigation, or when a different method or equipment is used.
RangeThe spread of a set of values from the smallest to the largest. For repeat readings, it is the largest reading minus the smallest.
UncertaintyHow far the true value may lie either side of a measured value. For repeat readings, it is often estimated as half the range.
Random errorAn unpredictable error that makes readings vary above and below the true value, so repeat readings differ from each other.
Systematic errorAn error that makes every reading differ from the true value by the same amount in the same direction.
Anomalous resultA result that does not fit the pattern of the other results.
Key points to remember
How were these notes?