2.22 - Marxist & Weberian Explanations for Gender Inequality
Marxist perspectives on gender inequality
While Marx himself did not directly explore gender or gender inequality, some sociologists have adapted his ideas to address these issues. Marxist feminists, who blend Marxist theory with feminist ideas, attempt to explain gender inequality by combining Marx's focus on class exploitation with concepts of patriarchy.
Weberian theories and the dual labour-market model
Many sociologists using this perspective look at the overall structure of the labour market to explain gender stratification.
The dual labour-market theory
A key Weberian-influenced explanation is the dual labour-market theory, proposed by sociologists Barron and Norris in the 1970s.
This theory suggests that the labour market is split into two distinct sectors:
- Primary sector - Consists of secure jobs with good pay and clear paths for promotion.
- Secondary sector - Features low pay, job insecurity, and little chance for promotion.
According to Barron and Norris, movement between these sectors is limited, trapping many workers in the secondary area. Women are disproportionately found in the secondary sector.
Reasons for women's concentration in disadvantaged sectors
Barron and Norris identify several key reasons why women end up in the disadvantaged secondary sector.
Stereotypical beliefs held by employers
Some employers may view women as unsuitable for primary-sector roles based on stereotypes, such as assumptions about women's commitment or abilities.
Disrupted career development
- Women often face interruptions in their careers due to social expectations around family responsibilities, such as childcare.
- Primary-sector jobs typically require continuous service and early recruitment, but time out for family can result in women lacking the experience needed for promotion upon return.
- As a result, women may be overlooked for advancements, even when they re-enter the workforce.
Weak legal and political support
The framework of laws and policies protecting women's workplace rights is often inadequate or poorly enforced.
Strengths and limitations of dual labour-market theory
Dual labour-market theory provides a useful framework for understanding vertical segregation in employment.
Strengths of dual labour-market theory
Emphasis on patriarchal organisation:
- The theory highlights how work in Western societies is structured patriarchally, with men in power positions normalising discrimination.
- This makes women's subordinate status seem natural, perpetuating inequality through everyday practices.
Challenge to assumptions about qualifications:
- It counters the idea that improving women's education or ambition alone will eliminate gender divisions.
- Even with equal qualifications, women remain disadvantaged due to the two-sector divide and underlying patriarchal stereotypes.
Limitations of dual labour-market theory
Bradley, in the late 1990s, argues that the theory overlooks inequalities within the same sector. For example, in teaching - which is not a secondary-sector occupation - women are still less likely than men to become headteachers, despite working in the same field.