11.12 - Employment & Development
The relocation of transnational corporations to developing countries
Transnational corporations (TNCs) are large businesses that operate across multiple countries. Many choose to establish operations such as factories and call centres in developing countries, often referred to as less economically developed countries (LEDCs).
Reasons for TNC relocation to LEDCs
- Reduced labour costs - Wages in LEDCs are considerably lower than in more economically developed countries (MEDCs), allowing TNCs to save on production expenses.
- Economic incentives - Developing countries often provide benefits like tax reductions or subsidies to attract foreign investment.
- Outsourcing opportunities - TNCs frequently contract local manufacturers in LEDCs to produce goods on their behalf, further cutting costs while maintaining brand control.
This relocation is driven by significant cost advantages, creating employment opportunities for local workers but raising concerns about fairness and exploitation.
The role of export processing zones in attracting investment
To draw TNCs into their economies, many developing countries create designated areas known as export processing zones (EPZs), which are a form of free trade zone (FTZ). These zones are tailored to offer a business-friendly environment with various incentives.
Incentives provided by export processing zones
- Tax exemptions - Companies in EPZs often benefit from reduced or waived taxes, increasing their profitability.
- Financial support for training - Some zones offer grants to cover worker training costs, lowering expenses for TNCs.
- Minimal regulation - EPZs typically have fewer rules, giving businesses greater operational freedom.
- Low wage structures - Wages are kept at a minimum, further reducing costs for companies.
- Restrictions on trade unions - In many EPZs, trade unions are either banned or heavily limited, preventing workers from organising for better conditions.
More than 100 developing countries worldwide have implemented such zones to boost foreign investment and stimulate economic growth.
Working conditions for employees in export processing zones
While EPZs create jobs in local communities, the conditions for workers often prioritise the interests of TNCs and local manufacturers over employee well-being. Industries like garment production and electronics assembly are prevalent in these zones, yet the focus on cost-cutting leads to significant challenges for workers.
Challenges faced by workers in EPZs
- Low pay and extended hours - Wages are often minimal, and working hours are long. For example, garment workers in some LEDCs might earn around $65 per month, compared to workers in European countries earning closer to $490 per month for similar roles.
- Inadequate health and safety measures - Basic workplace safety standards and comforts, such as regular breaks or proper facilities, are frequently neglected.
- Lack of job security - Many workers are on short-term or casual contracts, sometimes renewed daily or weekly, offering no stability.
- Limited skill development - Jobs in EPZs are generally unskilled, with high-skill positions like design or marketing often based in MEDCs. Opportunities for training or career advancement are rare.
- Gender inequality - Women often constitute the majority of the workforce, particularly in garment industries where they can make up to 90% of employees. They are typically paid less than men, highlighting disparities that TNCs may exploit for profit.
- Child labour concerns - In some EPZs, child labour is used, raising serious ethical issues about exploitation.
- Barriers to worker advocacy - With trade unions often banned or restricted, workers find it difficult to push for improved wages or conditions.
- Oversupply of labour - The large pool of people willing to work in EPZs means employers have little motivation to offer better pay or conditions, as replacement workers are readily available.
Arguments for and against the establishment of export processing zones
The creation of EPZs generates significant debate, with differing perspectives on whether they provide economic benefits or perpetuate exploitation in developing countries.
Perspectives on export processing zones
- Marxist criticism - Theorists like Fröbel (1980) argue that EPZs are a modern form of exploitative colonialism, with TNCs benefiting at the expense of local workers.
- Globalist perspective - Supporters believe EPZs help global consumers by keeping product prices low through reduced production costs.
- Wage comparison debate - Although wages in EPZs are low compared to industrialised countries, they are often higher than the average local earnings in developing economies.
These varied viewpoints underline the tension between economic development and ethical considerations in global employment practices.