8.1 - Measuring Human Development
The concept of human development
Human development refers to the process of improving conditions in a country or society over time, expanding people's opportunities such as access to employment and education. This concept assumes that higher development leads to better lives for residents, focusing on enhancements in various aspects of well-being.
Country classifications by development level
Countries are classified based on their level of human development, which reflects overall progress in areas like economy, health, and education.
Key classifications:
- Developing country - A nation with a low level of human development.
- Emerging country - A nation with a medium or high level of human development.
- Developed country - A nation with a very high level of human development.
Efforts to promote human development
Governments and organisations implement policies, programmes, and investments to foster human development. These initiatives can occur domestically or involve assistance from one country to another. For example, a developed country supporting a developing one through aid or projects.
Human development is a contested concept, meaning people hold differing views on what constitutes improvement. These differences stem from political and cultural perspectives, leading to varied goals such as prioritising wealth, health, or happiness, along with diverse strategies to achieve them.
Traditional measurement of human development using GDP
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the total value of all goods and services produced in a country over a year, serving as an indicator of national wealth. Historically, GDP has been the primary metric for assessing human development, based on the idea that boosting a country's income would raise citizens' wealth and overall well-being.
Variations of GDP used in development measurement
To provide more nuanced insights, adjusted forms of GDP are often employed.
Common variations of GDP:
- GDP per capita - A country's GDP divided by its population, showing average income per person.
- GDP adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP) - An adjustment that accounts for differences in what money can buy across countries, enabling fairer comparisons of living standards.
Role of GDP in development policies
An increase in GDP has traditionally been seen as the core objective of human development. This focus has shaped policies aimed at economic growth, such as attracting investments into industries to expand production and trade.
Examples of GDP values across countries
The following table illustrates GDP figures for selected countries, highlighting variations in national wealth.
| Country | GDP (US$ billion, 2021) |
|---|---|
| USA | 22,996 |
| UK | 3,187 |
| China | 17,734 |
| Nigeria | 441 |
| Brazil | 1,609 |
These values demonstrate how GDP reflects economic scale, with higher figures often associated with more developed nations.
Challenges to GDP as a measure of human development
Critics argue that GDP's emphasis on economic factors overlooks broader aspects of quality of life, such as health and environmental impact. This has prompted the creation of alternative measures that incorporate a wider range of human development indicators.
The Happy Planet Index
The Happy Planet Index (HPI) is a metric that evaluates 'sustainable wellbeing' without relying on wealth. It combines three key components to assess how effectively countries achieve long, happy lives with minimal environmental harm.
Components of the Happy Planet Index:
- Wellbeing - The average level of life satisfaction or happiness reported by people.
- Life expectancy - The average number of years a person is expected to live.
- Ecological footprint - The average environmental impact of an individual, measured by resource consumption and waste production.
Complex relationship between wealth and other development measures
Wealthier countries often have higher life expectancies. However, they may score poorly on wellbeing or ecological footprint. For instance, Vanuatu, with a modest GDP, ranked 2nd out of 140 countries in the 2021 HPI, driven by strong wellbeing scores. In contrast, Luxembourg ranked 143rd despite high life expectancy and wellbeing, due to its large ecological footprint.
This illustrates that economic growth does not always align with sustainable or holistic development.
Alternative models of development: Bolivia's approach
While Western models often prioritise wealth accumulation, other cultures and political systems offer contrasting views. Bolivia provides a notable example of challenging dominant development paradigms through indigenous and socialist influences.
Historical context of Bolivia's development challenges
From the late 1970s to the early 2000s, Bolivia experienced economic instability, including fluctuations between growth and crises, alongside high unemployment. Under pressure from international bodies like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the government pursued privatisation. This aimed to stimulate growth but largely failed to deliver widespread benefits.
Evo Morales's model of development
Elected in 2005, President Evo Morales introduced policies rooted in socialism – a system emphasising public ownership of resources and equal wealth distribution – and indigenous philosophies. His approach critiqued capitalism for benefiting only a small elite through profit-driven growth.
A key element of Bolivia's indigenous philosophy is sumak kawsay, a concept meaning 'good living', which promotes harmony between communities and nature. It prioritises sustainable use of resources like forests and water over private exploitation for profit. Morales implemented nationalisation of oil and gas resources and land redistribution to embody these ideas.
Outcomes of Bolivia's development model
This approach achieved significant successes, such as reducing the percentage of Bolivians living below the international poverty line from 15.6% in 2005 to 1.9% in 2019. Additionally, GDP grew by 257% during Morales's presidency, even though economic expansion was not the primary focus.
However, challenges persisted, including ongoing inequality, insufficient progress on gender equality, and human rights issues, such as overcrowded prisons due to trial delays.
GDP as a tool for broader quality of life improvements
Despite criticisms, GDP remains a common development measure because many view economic growth as a pathway to enhancements in other areas like health and rights. This perspective is exemplified by Hans Rosling, a Swedish doctor and statistician who co-founded Gapminder, an organisation that creates animated graphs showing relationships between income and development indicators over time.
Rosling's argument on economic growth
Rosling contended that GDP growth is not the ultimate goal but a means to achieve vital improvements, including better environmental quality, health, life expectancy, and human rights. He emphasised that wealth enables investments in these areas, though the relationship is not always straightforward.
Gapminder graphs and trends in development
Gapminder graphs plot indicators like infant mortality – the number of deaths of children under one year old per 1,000 live births – against GDP per capita (adjusted for PPP). Data from 1975 and 2015 reveal a strong negative correlation: as countries' incomes rise, infant mortality generally falls. However, exceptions exist.
Trends observed in Gapminder data:
- In 1975, many African and Asian countries (represented by larger dots indicating population size) clustered in low-income, high-mortality areas.
- By 2015, there was a shift towards higher incomes and lower mortality, particularly in Asia, reflecting economic progress and health improvements.
- Regional differences persist, with wealthier regions like Europe showing consistently lower infant mortality.
These patterns underscore how economic growth can drive human development, though other factors also play a role.