3.9 - Approaches to Macroeconomic Policy
Historical context of government intervention during the Great Depression
The Great Depression, starting in 1929 in the United States and lasting until the late 1930s, marked a severe global economic downturn characterised by declining production, falling prices (deflation), and widespread unemployment. This period highlighted the limitations of limited government involvement and led to a shift towards more active economic policies.
Key features and policy responses in the Great Depression
- Economic impacts - Governments faced reduced income from taxes while expenses for supporting the unemployed increased significantly.
- Initial policy approach - In the 1920s, the dominant classical view prioritised a balanced budget as the key economic objective, leading to contractionary fiscal measures such as reductions in public sector wages and support for the jobless.
- Consequences of these policies - Such actions worsened the situation by deepening unemployment and prolonging the economic slump.
- Shift in thinking - The failures during this era prompted a reevaluation of economic strategies, moving away from minimal intervention towards greater government involvement to stimulate recovery.
In the United States, early responses followed a laissez-faire philosophy, which emphasises minimal government interference in markets to allow natural adjustments. Taxes remained low initially to promote business investments and household spending, but as revenues dropped, they were raised to prevent a budget deficit—where government spending exceeds income. This approach delayed recovery until more expansionary measures were introduced.
Roosevelt's New Deal in the United States
President Roosevelt's New Deal represented a major policy change, introducing government-funded initiatives to create employment and build infrastructure. These efforts helped alleviate joblessness and hardship. Additionally, increased military expenditure during the Second World War played a key role in restoring economic stability.
The Gold Standard and its economic effects
The Gold Standard was a monetary system where a country's currency could be exchanged for a set quantity of gold held by the central bank. This framework limited economic flexibility and contributed to the challenges of the Great Depression.
How the Gold Standard operated and its limitations
- Fixed currency supply - The amount of money in circulation was tied to gold reserves, restricting the ability to expand the money supply or reduce interest rates during downturns.
- Impact on exchange rates - It created essentially fixed exchange rates between participating countries, which could harm a nation's ability to compete in exports if its currency became overvalued.
- Contractionary effects - During the Depression, adherence to the Gold Standard enforced tight monetary policy, preventing measures that could boost spending and investment.
Recovery after abandoning the Gold Standard
Britain's departure from the Gold Standard in 1931 allowed for more flexible policies, including reduced interest rates and a devaluation of the currency. These changes had an expansionary impact by encouraging higher consumption and investment. Public works projects, such as building roads and other infrastructure, generated employment and supported economic growth.
Keynesian fiscal policy and economic schools of thought
In the mid-20th century, Keynesian ideas gained prominence, advocating for government action to manage economic cycles. This approach was widely adopted to promote stability and growth.
Principles and outcomes of Keynesian fiscal policy
Fiscal policy involves government decisions on taxation and expenditure to influence the economy. Keynes proposed that during slumps, increased public spending could stimulate aggregate demand—the total demand for goods and services across the economy.
In the United Kingdom, policies focused on achieving full employment, where almost everyone seeking work can find it, by adjusting taxes and spending to regulate demand. This demand management helped moderate economic fluctuations, leading to consistent expansion, low joblessness, and stable prices in the 1950s and 1960s, though cycles persisted in milder forms.
Contrasting economic schools of thought
Different perspectives on economic management emerged, influencing policy choices.
| School of thought | Key beliefs | Implications for policy |
|---|---|---|
| Keynesians | Government action is essential to achieve full employment and maximum output (full capacity, where the economy produces at its sustainable limit). After downturns, recovery is slow due to sticky prices and wages, potentially leaving the economy underperforming without intervention. | Support active fiscal and monetary policies to boost demand during recessions. |
| Classical economists | The economy naturally returns to full capacity and employment quickly, as prices and wages adjust flexibly to changes in demand. | Favour minimal intervention, allowing market forces to correct imbalances. |
| Monetarists | Align with classical views, emphasising rapid self-adjustment to full capacity through market mechanisms. | Prioritise controlling money supply over direct spending interventions. |
Quantitative easing as a monetary policy tool
Quantitative easing (QE) is an unconventional form of monetary policy used when traditional tools, like adjusting interest rates, are insufficient—often when rates are already near zero or negative. It aims to increase the money supply to encourage lending and spending.
How quantitative easing works
Central banks, such as the Bank of England, create new money electronically to purchase assets like government bonds from financial institutions. Monetary policy, including QE, is managed by central banks to control the money supply and interest rates, complementing fiscal measures.
Implementation and effects in the UK
- Introduction - QE was introduced in 2009 following the 2008 financial crisis, with the Bank of England buying items such as Treasury bills, injecting funds into the system.
- Initial challenges - At first, banks held onto the money to build reserves rather than lending it out, delaying the impact.
- Longer-term outcomes - Over time, this led to more loans, investments, and purchases, raising aggregate demand and inflation.
- Benefits - QE helps maintain low currency values, enhancing export competitiveness, and builds confidence during economic slumps.
- Risks - If lending is postponed until conditions improve, it could cause demand-pull inflation, where excessive demand drives up prices.
Central bank considerations and inflation targeting
Central banks, like the Bank of England, prioritise maintaining price stability while considering wider economic goals. This involves balancing inflation control with supporting growth and employment.
Key aspects of central bank decision-making
- Primary objective - In the UK, the focus is on keeping inflation close to a target, as stable prices support sustainable growth.
- Handling inflation deviations - From January 2010 to March 2012, inflation rose above 4%, but the Bank kept interest rates low and continued QE to avoid a potential renewed recession (a "double dip").
- Forward-looking approach - Decisions were based on forecasts that inflation would fall naturally, without needing tighter policy that could harm recovery.
Principles of inflation targeting
The UK targets 2% inflation, with a tolerance band of 1% either side. In exceptional situations, central banks may allow temporary overshoots to prevent greater economic damage, such as prolonged unemployment or stalled growth. This flexible approach reflects the need to weigh inflation against other objectives like full employment.