15.1 - Absolute & Relative Poverty
The difference between equality and equity
Equality and equity both relate to fairness in economic systems, but they differ in their approach and application. Equality focuses on identical treatment for all, while equity emphasises adjusting for individual circumstances to achieve fair outcomes.
Equality vs equity
- Equality - Involves treating everyone exactly the same, providing identical resources or opportunities regardless of personal situations. It is objective and based on measurable facts.
- Equity - Centres on fairness by considering people's differing needs and circumstances, so treatment varies to ensure just results. It is subjective and relies on judgements about what is fair.
Types of equity
- Horizontal equity - Applies when individuals in similar situations are treated the same way, ensuring consistency for those with comparable circumstances.
- Vertical equity - Involves treating people in different situations differently but fairly, often to address disparities.
Examples of equity in taxation
- Horizontal equity occurs when individuals earning the same income pay identical tax amounts.
- Vertical equity is seen when higher earners pay more tax, reflecting their greater ability to contribute.
Impacts of unequal distribution of income and wealth
The way income and wealth are spread across society can influence both individuals and the broader economy. Unequal distributions often lead to a mix of drawbacks and potential benefits, affecting productivity, growth, and social well-being.
Negative effects of unequal distribution
- Persistent poverty - High inequality can keep absolute and relative poverty levels elevated, trapping people in hardship.
- Limited economic growth - Poorer individuals may lack the resources to invest in education or start businesses, wasting potential talent and slowing overall progress.
- Increased import spending - As wealth concentrates among the rich, they often spend more on imported goods, removing money from the domestic economy.
- Social consequences - Greater inequality is linked to higher rates of health issues, crime, and reduced overall happiness in society.
Positive effects of unequal distribution
- Motivation for effort - Lower-income groups may be inspired to work harder or pursue better opportunities to improve their position, potentially boosting national productivity.
- Encouragement for entrepreneurship - The prospect of gaining significant wealth can drive people to launch new businesses, fostering innovation and job creation.
- Trickle-down effect - Some argue that wealthier individuals invest more in enterprises, generating employment and income that eventually benefits lower-income groups, helping to alleviate absolute poverty.
A completely even spread of income and wealth might be viewed as unfair, as it could remove rewards for extra effort or risk-taking in business activities.
Types and causes of poverty
Poverty represents a lack of resources that prevents people from meeting basic needs or keeping up with societal standards. It exists in different forms and stems from various economic factors, affecting both individuals and wider communities.
Types of poverty
- Relative poverty - Occurs when a person's income is low compared to the average in their country, such as earning below 50% of the average income. This means someone in a wealthy nation could experience relative poverty, while the same income in a poorer country might indicate affluence.
- Absolute poverty - Involves an inability to afford essentials like food and housing. It is measured against a poverty line, such as the World Bank's threshold of $1.90 per day, which defines the minimum income required for survival.
Causes of poverty
- Unemployment - Without jobs, people often rely on limited state support, placing them at the lower end of income scales even in supportive systems.
- Low wages - Individuals with minimal skills or education are more likely to earn insufficient pay, struggling to cover costs.
- Slow growth in state benefits - When benefits increase at a slower rate than average wages, those dependent on them see their relative income decline over time.
The poverty trap
The poverty trap describes a situation where low-income individuals face barriers to improving their financial position due to the structure of taxes and benefits. This can create disincentives to work more or seek better-paying jobs.
How the poverty trap operates
- It primarily affects those on low wages or relying on state benefits, including means-tested benefits that depend on income levels.
- Earning more can lead to only a small net gain, as individuals pay income tax and National Insurance contributions (in the UK), while their benefits decrease due to higher earnings.
- In extreme cases, this might even reduce disposable income, resulting in a high marginal tax rate (the percentage deducted from the next pound earned through taxes and benefit reductions).
Consequences and government responses
- The combined effects of taxation, contributions, and benefit rules can make it unprofitable for some to take on work or extra hours.
- Governments may introduce policies to reduce these barriers, such as adjusting tax thresholds or benefit taper rates, to encourage employment and income growth.