12.3 - Returns to Scale
The meaning of returns to scale
Returns to scale refer to the change in output that results from altering all factor inputs by the same proportion in the long run. In this period, businesses can adjust every aspect of production, such as labour, capital, and raw materials, to expand or contract operations.
Types of returns to scale
There are three main types of returns to scale, each describing a different relationship between input changes and output levels.
Increasing returns to scale
- Occur when increasing all factor inputs by a certain proportion leads to a greater proportional rise in output.
- For example, if all inputs are increased by 50%, output might rise by 80%.
- Result in falling long-run average costs, as more output is generated per unit of input.
Constant returns to scale
- Happen when a proportional increase in all factor inputs results in an equal proportional increase in output.
- For example, increasing all inputs by 75% leads to exactly 75% more output.
- Lead to unchanged long-run average costs, with costs rising in line with output.
Decreasing returns to scale
- Arise when a proportional increase in all factor inputs produces a smaller proportional increase in output.
- For example, quadrupling all inputs might only triple the output.
- Cause rising long-run average costs, as less output is achieved per unit of input.
The relationship between returns to scale and economies of scale
While related, returns to scale and economies of scale are distinct concepts. Returns to scale focus on the output response to input changes, whereas economies of scale concern cost reductions as production expands.
Key differences and connections
- Returns to scale - Examine the direct link between scaled inputs and resulting output levels.
- Economies of scale - Relate to decreases in average costs per unit as output grows.
- Increasing returns to scale support economies of scale by enabling more efficient production and lower costs.
- Decreasing returns to scale contribute to diseconomies of scale, where costs per unit rise due to inefficiencies in larger operations.
Long-run average costs and the minimum efficient scale
The long-run average cost (LRAC) curve illustrates how average costs change with output in the long run, when all inputs can be varied. It typically shows a downward slope initially due to economies of scale, levels off with constant returns, and may rise with diseconomies.
The concept of minimum efficient scale
The minimum efficient scale (MES) is the smallest output level at which a firm achieves the lowest possible long-run average cost. This point, or range of points, represents optimal production efficiency.
Factors influencing minimum efficient scale
| Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| Position on LRAC curve | The first output level where LRAC reaches its minimum; may be a single point or a range. |
| Industry variations | Differs across sectors; industries with high fixed costs (e.g., aircraft manufacturing) have a larger MES. |
| Impact on firm size | Favours larger firms in high-MES industries, as they can spread costs over more output. |
| Effect on market structure | Leads to fewer, bigger firms in industries with large MES. |